What makes my arguments invalid and irrelevant? You are insinuating I’m posting in bad faith with an underlying motive, which couldn’t be further from the truth.This is nonsense (especially on this specific thread); the people whom you are accusing here (myself included) are simply responding to people criticising our vehicles with invalid & irrelevant points because of either ulterior motives or basic misunderstanding of the product; furthermore, the only reason we’re bothering to respond in the first place is because it’s extremely misleading for people whom are genuinely interested in the vehicle (of which I counted you one which is why I responded to you in the first place) & we’re trying to be helpful. Pointing out that the comparisons being made are nonsensical & from a biased perspective, as well as pointing out that there’s a fundamental difference between a true 4x4 & an SUV & that one’s expectations need to be appropriate for the vehicle type, is not ‘setting ourselves apart’ or calling others ‘pretenders’.
I’ll say it again: it’s about knowing what makes sense for your own needs & making your choice accordingly. There’s nothing wrong with an SUV if that fits your needs, but for the love of god stop criticising a purpose built true 4x4 because it’s not a perfect SUV (it’s not supposed to be)!
What have I said that is misleading? What makes this a “proper” 4x4 while others are SUVs? This isn’t 2005 anymore, live axles or ladder frame construction are not defining factors of an off-roader. Technology has evolved far beyond that loint
Under the assumption that the IG is a “proper” “purpose-built” (this sounds as if it was taken straight out of the marketing booklet) 4x4, it is atrociously priced for such utility. If this is solely built to be a true 4x4, then how many do you think are realistically going to off road/bang up a $72k vehicle?