The Grenadier Forum
Register Now for enhanced site access.
INEOS Agents, Dealers or Commercial vendors please contact admin@theineosforum.com for a commercial account.

Front diff failure

AWo

Local time
6:35 PM
Joined
Feb 28, 2023
Messages
1,059
Reaction score
1,980
Location
Germany
Background:

In deed, breaking in differential gears is necessary. In the beginning the surfaces are not aligned to each other. Small uneven edges and peaks have remained from the mechanical treatment. That impedes heat transfer between the gears and its teeth. In addition the metal structure is not as dense at that time as after breaking in.

That's why in the beginning you should not tow, require high torque or drive at high speed. Otherwise you get local overheating and the metal structure is not as dense yet as it should be. That supports breaking out of parts. When the gears harmonize the surfaces getting smoother and their surfaces gain more contact, the structure gets more dense and the heat transfer gets better and to the required level. The oil change is needed to get rid of small metal and attrited phosphatic coating parts.

Maybe this guideline wasn't followed and the damage would have come anyway, having done an oil change or not. Of course, when you would have done the missed oil change the damage which (may have) build up would not have been detected, as no one looks at the gears (except bigger metal parts would have been found in the oil) or the oil would have been analyzed. But it gave Ineos the possibility to reject warranty.

AWo
 
Local time
5:35 PM
Joined
Aug 9, 2023
Messages
353
Reaction score
719
Location
Australia
Carraro requesting early diff oil change must be the result of some diff manufacturing processes being deleted or changed similar to what happened to engine connecting rods in the last 20 years. The diffs may be like some tractor diffs where crown and pinions are no longer matched sets or lapping the crown wheel and pinion is not used any more.
There must be a reason, besides contamination Ineos changes the whole axle assembly and not just the diff which would be more cost effective. It was mentioned on a FB group the complete axle assembly is around $20k aud to change over.
 
Local time
12:35 PM
Joined
Apr 28, 2023
Messages
947
Reaction score
845
Location
Pittsburgh
The obvious upsetting part about this, is, you cannot document your own changes as advertised, and have it count. As such, the catastrophic failure at this mileage, which really cannot happen to any diff sold by anyone, anywhere, other than with a manufacturing issue, isn't being covered if you happen to live remote, which was the whole purpose of the truck.

I try to avoid labeling people with the fanboy tag, but think about this fellas. This guy is not to blame, and the dealer and Ineos knows it. If the diff fluid wasn't changed at 12000, and this used cast gears that needed it, the absolute WORST outlier one should expect at this mileage is pre mature wear and noise. Being that changing consumables (oil, belts, hoses, etc) are set at intervals that statistically guarantee (ideally) NO failures under warranty, even THAT becomes a wild ass stretch to say its due to consumer neglect and therefore shouldn't be covered. This is a horrid outcome and everyone should be on notice. You know what happens to GM ls engines that don't have the oil changed and fail? They swap it. Ford? They require receipts, then they rebuild it. Ford f350 diffs are 30,000 recommended if working at max load. 150k if just a mall cruiser. But if the warranty is active, it's just covered period. I've had guys do stupid shit and ignore service with assigned company trucks, but I have NEVER had a warranty denial in all these years. Blaming this fella for a catastrophic Axle assembly failure at 17000 miles is utterly indefensible bullshit for a manufacturer, and portends deeper issues. He had it in at 75% of the mileage, and if it was THAT critical, he SHOULD have been told to have it done. EVERY time I've had service interval done the manager tried to up sell to the next one just in case. It's what they get paid to do.

All that, and if axle failure is a possibility at 17k without the fluid swap, why the hell did they use these in the first place?
 
Back
Top Bottom