The Grenadier Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to contribute to the community by adding your own topics, posts, and connect with other members through your own private inbox! INEOS Agents, Dealers or Commercial vendors please contact admin@theineosforum.com for a commercial account.

General Diesel or Petrol

I recall one US YouTuber (sorry can't recall which one) about 2 years ago ordered a Defender 90? for themselves and when they picked it up at the dealer they couldn't drive away because the engine failed and had to be replaced.
Several months later a new engine and on the drive home it went into limp home mode.
Turns out the dealer had damaged a wiring loom when putting the new engine in.
They then had to wait for a new wiring loom to arrive from overseas.
Personally I would have requested a whole new vehicle.
It was TFL check out their Tube
 
This Harry's video on JCB hydrogen research is good news. Sounds like hydrogen motors are really close to production. Also gives hope that retrofitting a hydrogen engine into a current ICE vehicle could be a good option going forward. I know INEOS is also working on this path. Lots of hope for the future of ICE power!

View: https://youtu.be/jxtxZY45RMM
 
It seems that one major hurdle with hydrogen is not just the technology (which gets closer and closer), but the infrastructure and lack of hydrogen filling stations. Outside of California, stations that are designed for automotive filling are few and far between. Compound that with our government's tunnel vision on EVs, and the impetus to truly push forward building-up for hydrogen is stunted.
 
It seems that one major hurdle with hydrogen is not just the technology (which gets closer and closer), but the infrastructure and lack of hydrogen filling stations. Outside of California, stations that are designed for automotive filling are few and far between. Compound that with our government's tunnel vision on EVs, and the impetus to truly push forward building-up for hydrogen is stunted.
That is the conclusion that Harry and Lord B came to as well.
 
There are many major hurdles for hydrogen. There is the thermodynamic inefficiency of producing it using electricity. However production using carbon sequestration from natural gas may solve it. Then there are the issues of economic storage and transport. The ICE issues are minor compared to the above. I think it will be a very expensive fuel.
 
There was a 7 series hydrogen model years ago, but burning hydrogen is way way less efficient than using a fuel cell. The sums don’t add up.
 
There are many major hurdles for hydrogen. There is the thermodynamic inefficiency of producing it using electricity. However production using carbon sequestration from natural gas may solve it. Then there are the issues of economic storage and transport. The ICE issues are minor compared to the above. I think it will be a very expensive fuel.
2 + 2 = ? The greenhouse gases-into-cocktails economy is one that I’d missed.

 
2 + 2 = ? The greenhouse gases-into-cocktails economy is one that I’d missed.

What are they using for energy to create these fuels? Especially in a war environment.
Jet fuel and diesel are already pretty close chemically, pretty easy to convert to diesel.
 
What are they using for energy to create these fuels? Especially in a war environment.
Jet fuel and diesel are already pretty close chemically, pretty easy to convert to diesel.
This stuff is in the research phase, I'll link something if I come across it in the public domain.

Setting Defence to one side, the wider circular carbon economy proposals typically presume biomass power generation makes a major contribution to renewable energy supply, with in-process carbon capture. This being a more realistic alternative to the yield and continuity (or lack of) from wind/solar etc.

Biomass power comes with its own issues, and has not yet been demonstrated at scale. I wouldn't write ICEs off just yet however.
 
Back
Top Bottom