I feel as though I am beating a dead horse here.But, you didn’t point out where he’s wrong. It would more helpful to dissect the message than the messenger. Can you do that for us?
His entire last paragraph is a simplistic assessment of an incredibly complex issue with a damning summation that is anything but fair.
To quote:
“…Source:I was a BMW Tech, I have the equipment at home. This is basically a BMW that Ineos went and screws with.
They should have done what Toyota did, re jigged the GUI and left what BMW has debugged alone. Now we have two systems that don’t play all that well together and some junior Software designer at Ineos who tried to re invent something that 100’s of millions of dollars and debugging have already been done too. It’s a complete disaster.”
I see this as nothing but another attempt to smear Ineos. He has been quite vocal about his displeasure with many of the features he has discovered about his Grenadier. Features that most people are aware of after watching a video review or two about the vehicle. Features that I suspect will be addressed with future software updates. Features that existed when he purchased the vehicle, from a dealer a long way from where he lived and implemented by a fledgling auto manufacturer who is just breaking into a new market. Features that every single Grenadier owner in this market has to live with.
I’d have a lot more respect for him if he simply acknowledged that he possibly made a bad decision when he purchased his Grenadier. I’ve seen a few used Grenadiers for sale so obviously he wouldn’t be the first. Then too, he is quick to label anyone who doesn’t agree with him as a “fanboy” or worse suggest that they somehow are not that bright. That is just childish.
Don’t get me wrong, I actually do have sympathy for his frustration. I have owned no fewer than 10 new vehicles in the past 19 years and most of them have had issues from the moment they came home. Some of those issues were maddening to live with too! The nature of modern automobiles to rely on software so heavily means that all new designs have software bugs. Even my current 2022 F-150 King Ranch gets over the air software updates regularly and although it is a vehicle of huge importance to Ford that is made in huge numbers, it has some incredibly annoying traits. What I’m trying to say is that even Ford gets these things wrong. They eventually get the problems worked out but in the mean time you live with whatever issue is presenting.
So, I repeat, I get the fact that he is frustrated. I simply detest his regular and amateurish attempts at smearing the company. I don’t believe that he has any real understanding of the challenges except from his own perspective. I wish he’d stop trying to suggest otherwise.
I have said more than enough on this now and I promise to bite my tongue in the future…