The Grenadier Forum
Register Now for enhanced site access.
INEOS Agents, Dealers or Commercial vendors please contact admin@theineosforum.com for a commercial account.

Robert Pepper review coming

bigleonski

Grenadier Owner
Local time
7:54 AM
Joined
Nov 5, 2022
Messages
2,168
Reaction score
4,812
Location
Brisbane QLD, Australia
I
Next review by Robert will be interesting. I think the rear axle load is very good but what about the front axle when you have a diesel, winch, roo bar and few extras via roof or meat pies... :D
isn’t the spring / shock set up adjusted by IA at the factory with increased spring rates etc based on those options? Wouldn’t that counter that?
 

MrMike

Lifetime Supporter
Local time
5:54 AM
Joined
Nov 25, 2022
Messages
1,646
Reaction score
2,477
Location
Australia
Next review by Robert will be interesting. I think the rear axle load is very good but what about the front axle when you have a diesel, winch, roo bar and few extras via roof or meat pies... :D
I think if you have all the gear, you'll go close to GVM. But...its about how people load their vehicles and vans/campers/trailers. I have a feeling he'll say pulling 3.5T is fraught with danger with an IG, and I know stupidity some will.
 

bakepl

Grenadier Owner
Local time
7:54 AM
Joined
Feb 11, 2022
Messages
542
Reaction score
1,000
Location
Brisbane, Australia
I think if you have all the gear, you'll go close to GVM. But...its about how people load their vehicles and vans/campers/trailers. I have a feeling he'll say pulling 3.5T is fraught with danger with an IG, and I know stupidity some will.
yes . similarly how any any dual cab ute rated as towing 3.5t can easily do this.... :ROFLMAO:
 
Local time
9:54 PM
Joined
Nov 14, 2021
Messages
1,172
Reaction score
2,423
For the Jeep hater in the room - you know who you are 😁 - Pepper's conclusion:

Pepper.png
 

Wilaspira

Grenadier Owner
Local time
4:54 PM
Joined
May 25, 2022
Messages
199
Reaction score
360
He hasn’t released his touring review yet. Where did you get that from?
The screen grab can be misinterpreted - it was only relating to off-road capabilities. Pepper was not saying the Wrangler Rubicon was a better touring 4x4 he was saying the Rubicon was a more focused off-road vehicle but that the Grenadier was more than capable as an off roader and better than most of its peers. With regard to its touring capability this would be discussed in the next review
 

AnD3rew

Inch deep and a mile wide.
Grenadier Owner
Lifetime Supporter
Local time
8:54 AM
Joined
Aug 24, 2022
Messages
2,436
Reaction score
6,046
The screen grab can be misinterpreted - it was only relating to off-road capabilities. Pepper was not saying the Wrangler Rubicon was a better touring 4x4 he was saying the Rubicon was a more focused off-road vehicle but that the Grenadier was more than capable as an off roader and better than most of its peers. With regard to its touring capability this would be discussed in the next review
I think this grab was an on paper review from a while back before he got a chance to see and drive a production one. He has released a video on its offroad performance, he promised another on touring which is yet to come
 
Local time
9:54 PM
Joined
Nov 14, 2021
Messages
1,172
Reaction score
2,423
The screen grab can be misinterpreted - it was only relating to off-road capabilities. Pepper was not saying the Wrangler Rubicon was a better touring 4x4 he was saying the Rubicon was a more focused off-road vehicle but that the Grenadier was more than capable as an off roader and better than most of its peers. With regard to its touring capability this would be discussed in the next review
Exactly right. Few people would ever choose a Wrangler over the Grenadier for long-range touring / overlanding; the Wrangler lacks payload, and the interior space is smaller. On the other hand, the Wrangler will be the far superior rock-crawler. They are two different tools designed for two different jobs. People who dislike the Wrangler typically fail to understand how incredibly focused it is on its task - technical off-road driving, especially rock-crawling, though it is a hoot on the beach as well - and are upset that it doesn't carve corners like a BMW X5, or they are upset because it cannot carry the same payload as a Toyota 70 series. Catering to either of those end-uses would compromise the Wrangler's phenomenal performance on steep, rocky terrain.

The screenshot came from this video, at about 29:30

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTgupbbRfog
 
Local time
9:54 PM
Joined
Nov 14, 2021
Messages
1,172
Reaction score
2,423
I hope it is not at the Wrangler levels - jeep is ranked #38 in quality/reliability in the US - with LR ranked #37 they are thankful everyday for jeep.
What study or data are you referring to? A lot of these reports focus on initial ownership experience, measured by returns to the dealer during the first couple of months of ownership. Most of these returns are glitchy electronic issues - like those being experienced by many Grenadier owners right now. Most Grenadier owners love their vehicle despite these software problems. Is the Grenadier a "bad" vehicle because of its current glitchy software?

Its hard to get good data on the kind of issues that really matter to owners. Of course, what really matters to people will vary, but in general, people want to know the following: Does the vehicle always start? Does it leave you stranded? Does it go into limp-mode for no good reason? And other things like that. So that is why I'm curious about your source. Also, the Wrangler gets lumped in with all other Jeep models when Jeep is evaluated, and the Wrangler has always been a more reliable platform than other models (Liberty, Compass, Grand Cherokee, etc.).

Another problem with these reliability reports in the truck world is that fleet vehicles get abused, and those problems get lumped in with the brand. Here in the U.S., heavy-duty working fleets are made up of Ford, Ram, and Chevy pickup trucks. These vehicles may be run all day long, because workers want to keep the heat or air-con running, and they get run with heavy loads, and maybe pulling heavy trailers. There are no heavy duty Toyota trucks in the U.S., so they are not found in any fleets, suffering the same level of abuse. This is definitely a confounding variable in comparing Toyota reliability to the big three American brands.

I've been driving 4x4s since 1985, and I've owned a heavy-duty Ram diesel, a Jeep CJ and JK, Toyota Landcruisers, pickup trucks, and 4-Runners. The Toyotas were a little more reliable with fewer repair costs than the Jeeps, but not by much. None of them were "problem" vehicles. But that's just one guy's experience, and I keep on top of all required service, and I halve most of the service intervals because my vehicles are regularly driven off-road (hot & dusty, water crossings, lots of steep rocky terrain) and regular on-road driving is over high elevation passes that are hard on a vehicle.

According to the 2023 JD Power rankings in the U.S., Jeep was #18 in 2023, while LR was dead last.

jd-power-dependability-2023.jpg
 

trobex

Grenadier Owner
Local time
9:54 PM
Joined
Dec 23, 2022
Messages
1,817
Reaction score
2,396
Location
Australia
What study or data are you referring to? A lot of these reports focus on initial ownership experience, measured by returns to the dealer during the first couple of months of ownership. Most of these returns are glitchy electronic issues - like those being experienced by many Grenadier owners right now. Most Grenadier owners love their vehicle despite these software problems. Is the Grenadier a "bad" vehicle because of its current glitchy software?

Its hard to get good data on the kind of issues that really matter to owners. Of course, what really matters to people will vary, but in general, people want to know the following: Does the vehicle always start? Does it leave you stranded? Does it go into limp-mode for no good reason? And other things like that. So that is why I'm curious about your source. Also, the Wrangler gets lumped in with all other Jeep models when Jeep is evaluated, and the Wrangler has always been a more reliable platform than other models (Liberty, Compass, Grand Cherokee, etc.).

Another problem with these reliability reports in the truck world is that fleet vehicles get abused, and those problems get lumped in with the brand. Here in the U.S., heavy-duty working fleets are made up of Ford, Ram, and Chevy pickup trucks. These vehicles may be run all day long, because workers want to keep the heat or air-con running, and they get run with heavy loads, and maybe pulling heavy trailers. There are no heavy duty Toyota trucks in the U.S., so they are not found in any fleets, suffering the same level of abuse. This is definitely a confounding variable in comparing Toyota reliability to the big three American brands.

I've been driving 4x4s since 1985, and I've owned a heavy-duty Ram diesel, a Jeep CJ and JK, Toyota Landcruisers, pickup trucks, and 4-Runners. The Toyotas were a little more reliable with fewer repair costs than the Jeeps, but not by much. None of them were "problem" vehicles. But that's just one guy's experience, and I keep on top of all required service, and I halve most of the service intervals because my vehicles are regularly driven off-road (hot & dusty, water crossings, lots of steep rocky terrain) and regular on-road driving is over high elevation passes that are hard on a vehicle.

According to the 2023 JD Power rankings in the U.S., Jeep was #18 in 2023, while LR was dead last.

View attachment 7822962
Jeep - the several owners I know who owned them in the last 5-years regretted ever entering the showroom... Wrangler/Chero and several of each. Terrible reliability.
 
Local time
7:54 AM
Joined
Mar 21, 2023
Messages
405
Reaction score
715
Location
Australia
I can see a lot exceeding the front axle load, and maybe GVM when you see them like below with a rack, RTT, awning, drawers, fridge, jerries/fuel pods.
I'll be towing with a 240kg ball weight and will be sailing close, estimate ~25kgs under GVM. 🤞 TM diesel with roobar, brush bars, side runners, roof bars, cargo barrier, 2 drawers, fridge, 180 awning, No winch.
A 3750 GVM upgrade should be pretty straight forward with the 3817kg combined axle weight so hopefully they become available sooner rather than later.
 

Attachments

  • FB_IMG_1691849851372.jpg
    FB_IMG_1691849851372.jpg
    101.1 KB · Views: 22
Last edited:

DCPU

Grenadier Owner
Local time
9:54 PM
Joined
Jul 27, 2022
Messages
6,005
Reaction score
13,343
Excellent video, once again doing the hard work many seem happy to ignore.

The front axle weight does seem to give pause for thought for Oz owners with full "outback" spec.
 

Loc Nar

Grenadier Owner
Lifetime Supporter
Local time
3:54 PM
Joined
Apr 28, 2022
Messages
498
Reaction score
969
Location
Alabama, USA
"Plus 2 heavies" - Pepper slinging salt. 🤣 My guess is Ineos is not providing payload weights for the Trialmaster and Fieldmaster variants because they are (hopefully!) in the process of making changes based upon all the excellent feedback on the initial releases courtesy of this forum and other owners for model year 2024 and beyond. In other words, the payload for those trims (and perhaps even the base Station Wagon) is a moving target right now.

After thinking about this further - I could be dreaming, but for some reason I remember an early Grenadier brochure (not sure which country) that had an asterisk or sword icon or some other footnote at the payload figure that gave adjusted payloads for the TM and FM editions. Does anyone else remember that?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom