IMO the two vehicles are chalk and cheese. The ND is very complex and very much a ‘JLR family‘ styled vehicle. Really comfy, drives well but seems to have mixed reliability. Often a bit blingy. I also thought it was noisy on the road for what is a styled ‘Range Rover’ costing close to £80k for a reasonably standard 110 with the 3 litre diesel engine.
IG looks well thought out, well engineered and well built (based on a close look at a pre-pro). Certainly much better assembled than a 110 near the end of production and I bet it doesn’t leak water into the passenger compartment. I’ve only had one Landie that didn’t leak at that‘s an L405.
I am biased, bought my first LR in 1978, not been without one since but they’ve moved too far upmarket for me now and IMO they were well out order taking Ineos on about TM given where the 80” came from.
Looking forward to taking delivery of our IG before summer 23.
IG looks well thought out, well engineered and well built (based on a close look at a pre-pro). Certainly much better assembled than a 110 near the end of production and I bet it doesn’t leak water into the passenger compartment. I’ve only had one Landie that didn’t leak at that‘s an L405.
I am biased, bought my first LR in 1978, not been without one since but they’ve moved too far upmarket for me now and IMO they were well out order taking Ineos on about TM given where the 80” came from.
Looking forward to taking delivery of our IG before summer 23.