The Grenadier Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to contribute to the community by adding your own topics, posts, and connect with other members through your own private inbox! INEOS Agents, Dealers or Commercial vendors please contact admin@theineosforum.com for a commercial account.

Letter to Lynne Calder

If we were all asking for the inclusion of specific features I'd like to see the engine oil pressure included on the temperature pane. But we're not so I won't.

I do think the inclusion of this type of info adds to the reliability of and trust in the vehicle which is arguably part of the Grenadier ethos.
 
I am drafting the letter just now, I am keeping it simple and to the basic points raised earlier in the thread.
If we are successful in opening channels of communication with IA through this letter / petition whatever we want to call it then that would be a better opportunity to raise other more minor issues and suggestions.
 
Last edited:
Well done, thank you for the effort.

My only comment or suggestion would be to expand on the workshop manual with a parts catalogue and exploded diagrams to make part identification and ordering easier - at the moment it is virtually impossible unless the vehicle is at an Ineos partner (like a bodyshop / 3rd party repairer).
 
Just a couple of thoughts
I would want to make sure the founders of the forum are comfortable with the wording - it’s not an “official” Forum communiqué, but still . . .
I would take out the litigation point - would try to make this about getting transparency vs hostility
I would not ask for any “guaranty” promise - no corporate attorney would ever agree to this after the fact - it should be more about what kind of service standard they want to set up
 
Just a couple of thoughts
I would want to make sure the founders of the forum are comfortable with the wording - it’s not an “official” Forum communiqué, but still . . .
I would take out the litigation point - would try to make this about getting transparency vs hostility
I would not ask for any “guaranty” promise - no corporate attorney would ever agree to this after the fact - it should be more about what kind of service standard they want to set up
It’s interesting that you read that as hostile. I tried to write it without hostility, I don’t feel the need to rant. Regarding the mis-selling, here in the UK it’s a big thing. Many banks and loan companies have faced lawsuits recently for mis-selling, and the dieselgate thing has resulted in loads of claims too. I really want IA to succeed as in a way I am an investor. A lawsuit does no one any favours… That said there could easily be one if the manual fails to materialise. I think they should know that. I wont be the one to start it, but someone else might.

I genuinely think that this forum is a massive positive for IA, I really hope that they realise that.
 
It’s interesting that you read that as hostile. I tried to write it without hostility, I don’t feel the need to rant. Regarding the mis-selling, here in the UK it’s a big thing. Many banks and loan companies have faced lawsuits recently for mis-selling, and the dieselgate thing has resulted in loads of claims too. I really want IA to succeed as in a way I am an investor. A lawsuit does no one any favours… That said there could easily be one if the manual fails to materialise. I think they should know that. I wont be the one to start it, but someone else might.

I genuinely think that this forum is a massive positive for IA, I really hope that they realise that.
Yeah I got it - but this will be read by their attorneys and it could be viewed as an implicit threat of legal action. I would just leave that bit out - it’s difficult to initiate open dialogue and improve transparency if that is lurking under the surface
 
Back
Top Bottom