Maybe you missed that....Recaro stated that production will continue and all contracts will be fulfilled. That is not uncommon in such situations when the insolvency administrator takes over. Not only Ineos has an interest in getting their orders done. Insolvency often doesn't mean an immediate stop. (See
https://www.theineosforum.com/threa...on-on-supplier-issue.12416655/post-1333299054 ).
This is also backed up by a statement from Recaro itself:
https://www.recaro-automotive.com/d...urer-leverages-judicial-restructuring-options (Press release in English:
https://www.recaro-automotive.com/e...ges-judicial-restructuring-options?&setLang=1)
One interesting point in that statement is that expected payments were not done by (a) customer(s) of Recaro on time (cash flow). I assume, the customer who hasn't paid their bill will not receive any products from Recaro until the payment is done. It it is not in the interest of that this customer to throw Recaro under the bus because that could lead to that Recaro mentions who has not paid the bill....so both are quite.
Another interesting point is the loss of a big order. A guy did some analysis and found that Recaro delivered seats for a whole range of Audi cars, which are going to disappear also on the motorsport side. He found 8 models based on the R8 which will be discontinued and the Porsche 718. He claimed that this are not high volume models, but they disappeared very quick and if other models leave the market these needs to be added. Maybe also high volumes have been lost of not Recaro branded seats for volume manufacturers. Maybe also the Fusilier meant a loss of a development and build order.
Check yourself:
https://www.recaro-automotive.com/de/oem
AWo