The Grenadier engine compartment is packed! Space is at a premium.My thoughts with the ARB are purely vanity I like the way the ARB breather itself looks hahaha
The Grenadier engine compartment is packed! Space is at a premium.My thoughts with the ARB are purely vanity I like the way the ARB breather itself looks hahaha
Sintered bronze filter on a breather extension, nice job. Soak in solvent every once in a while to remove the dirt and it’ll last for years.
Probably because the use rate percentage would be low I would think. But on a TM spec, definitely should be there.Really wish these came from the factory. Give its purpose built mantra, why the hell do they not come with raised diff breathers?
What if we are overthinking the problem? Carraro builds axles for a whole range of heavy equipment. Most of them are used in construction/hauling machines, and I've never personally seen raised diff breathers on such machines. It doesn't make sense to raise a breather which only vents out. Maybe it has a lot to do with the beam axle internals and type of the seals. I think that some positive pressure inside the diff is a very desirable thing to have by design, this actually prevents the water getting inside through the seals more than having it at atmospheric pressure and submerged in 80cm of water (if using atmospheric breathers - because it makes no sense to extend the breathers if using the same one-way vent).
Ineos never said that you can park your car in 80cm of water. As long as the engine is running, the air fan is on max on fresh air and you are moving, there is no time for sufficient water to get in anywhere to cause damage.
But if you stall, or stop, or park in 80cm of water, then it becomes a problem.
Maybe we need a more complex mathematical model of why we are doing raised breathers, myself included in my LC80. What are the pressure differences inside the diff between atmospheric breathers and closed one-way breathers when submerged in different depths of water, for example.
Maybe we are wasting our time and resources to solve problems that do not exist. Dunno, just sayin...
<snip>
Maybe we are wasting our time and resources to solve problems that do not exist. Dunno, just sayin...
Provided this breather and the axle seals ! work, there is no way water can get into the axle. If both items are worn out, different story.
Actually, there should be near zero pressure difference with raised (atmospheric) breathers. Your worn seal analogy would apply to the original breather.If one is using atmospheric breathers, there is an unfortunate corner case where you might have worn seals (but not actually failed) and the water will be pushed through because of the pressure difference while submerged. This would not happen with the original breather.
Is alexandruast perhaps saying that the original breather could maintain enough positive pressure that the seals would remain seated (enough to prevent water ingress)?Actually, there should be near zero pressure difference with raised (atmospheric) breathers. Your worn seal analogy would apply to the original breather.
it seems to me that an air-permeable waterproof filter/valve at the engine end of a breather tube would solve everyones, including the possibility of condensation within the tubing draining back to the diff. There are PTFE or similar membranes that would serve though i havent seen any with pipe fittings. I expect theyd become contaminated and fail over time being connected to a pool of oil, anyone whos ruined an expensive goretex jacket will understand exactly what im talking. For myself, I think i will be satisfied with secure tubing and a sintered filter in a clean-ish area of the engine bay