Not sure if that's a compliment or insult. Either way, you're correct.@Krabby your high school educator is showing
Not sure if that's a compliment or insult. Either way, you're correct.@Krabby your high school educator is showing
Quick aside, Physics was the best class I had in high school and I'm an dunce.Not sure if that's a compliment or insult. Either way, you're correct.
Again, not sure if that's a compliment or an insult.Quick aside, Physics was the best class I had in high school and I'm an dunce.
I am not worthy, a big bow of respect! DaBullWhile the force placed upon each vehicle would be equal, the respective resulting accelerations would not be equal. MASS COMES INTO PLAY! (Newton's Second Law) Where p=mv (momentum = mass x velocity).
If a Grenadier is traveling at 100 kph (27.78 meters per sec) it's momentum has a value of 75,006 kg-mps (2700 kg x 27.78 mps), whereas a Mazda Miata/MX5 also traveling 100 kph has a momentum of 30,308 kg-mps (1091 kg x 27.78 mps) (again, it's way more complicated than this, put for all intents and purposes the force is equivalent but where things end up is not). I believe in order for these two vehicles to "rebound" the same distance (which I think would essentially be a dead stop), the Miata has to be traveling around 250 kph!
Edit -I'm not a physicist but play one on TV
Second edit - from HERE
"...Newton's third law of motion is naturally applied to collisions between two objects. In a collision between two objects, both objects experience forces that are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction. Such forces often cause one object to speed up (gain momentum) and the other object to slow down (lose momentum). According to Newton's third law, the forces on the two objects are equal in magnitude. While the forces are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction, the accelerations of the objects are not necessarily equal in magnitude. In accord with Newton's second law of motion, the acceleration of an object is dependent upon both force and mass. Thus, if the colliding objects have unequal mass, they will have unequal accelerations as a result of the contact force that results during the collision.
Consider the collision between the club head and the golf ball in the sport of golf. When the club head of a moving golf club collides with a golf ball at rest upon a tee, the force experienced by the club head is equal to the force experienced by the golf ball. Most observers of this collision have difficulty with this concept because they perceive the high speed given to the ball as the result of the collision. They are not observing unequal forces upon the ball and club head, but rather unequal accelerations. Both club head and ball experience equal forces, yet the ball experiences a greater acceleration due to its smaller mass. In a collision, there is a force on both objects that causes an acceleration of both objects. The forces are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction, yet the least massive object receives the greatest acceleration."
Third edit - please tell me where have a physicist (or physics teacher) here who can explain this for real. I think what I am saying is correct, but Physics 201 was 30 years ago!
With wires thick enough, 2.5 qmm at a minimum or 24 V. The wire of the light bar is thick, very thick, I assume 2,5 qmm.
I'll check that and post a picture of the cable this evening.
AWo
If there is a restriction put in new cables.
AWo
front and rear outlet referred as A and B, do allow a max load of 320W overall. Connector is rated 10A so continues current 12*10 = 120W is the limit for such a single 12Vdc car outlet.New fuse + new cable and we’re good to go then I assume. Interesting!
I found this sticker by the 12V outlet in the cargo area. 320W sounds very low, and is easily surpassed by lights alone.
Does anyone know what this is referring to?
Which outlets are included in this limitation? 12V in the cargo area + 12V+usb a/c in the glove box + usb a/c in the rear seats?front and rear outlet referred as A and B, do allow a max load of 320W overall. Connector is rated 10A so continues current 12*10 = 120W is the limit for such a single 12Vdc car outlet.
Devices often have a spike in current when started up.Which outlets are included in this limitation? 12V in the cargo area + 12V+usb a/c in the glove box + usb a/c in the rear seats?
And how can the max load be 320W if the fuse is 10A (=120W)?
We didn’t get the inverter but my assumption is that the two domestic plug points are what is included in the 320w inverter max watts. Amps and watts are different things and don’t necessarily have a fixed relationship because you need to factor in resistance as well. Need to use Ohms law.Which outlets are included in this limitation? 12V in the cargo area + 12V+usb a/c in the glove box + usb a/c in the rear seats?
And how can the max load be 320W if the fuse is 10A (=120W)?
Sorry for the total lack of knowledge on the topic. I will try to search for more info on how Ohms law works in real life…
The 52" ST4K stedi light bar satisfies the 25a restriction and turns night into day.I thought we were limited to 12V and 25A, I still have a lot to learn re the electrics of the car. Please post of how you install it as I’m looking for a good solution myself. Both for 50+ inch led-bar and powerful front lights.
The front 12V outlet controlled by fuse FC21 and is 15A (180W nominal)Which outlets are included in this limitation? 12V in the cargo area + 12V+usb a/c in the glove box + usb a/c in the rear seats?
And how can the max load be 320W if the fuse is 10A (=120W)?
Sorry for the total lack of knowledge on the topic. I will try to search for more info on how Ohms law works in real life…
And how can the max load be 320W if the fuse is 10A (=120W)?
Sorry for the total lack of knowledge on the topic. I will try to search for more info on how Ohms law works in real life…
Did you use the Stedi mounts for the Rhino Rack? I'm considering the 42" ST4K...The 52" ST4K stedi light bar satisfies the 25a restriction and turns night into day.
Yes. I originally tried to mount it under rack to be level with the front, but there is just not enough room for the double row light bar. I had to ad the extensions that come with it and mount in front. It looks sweet, especially with the optional cover on, so I am certainly not disappointed.Did you use the Stedi mounts for the Rhino Rack? I'm considering the 42" ST4K...
I get automatically rerouted to stediusa web site, where it doesn't list the 52". Seeing your Gren I think I do want 52"!Yes. I originally tried to mount it under rack to be level with the front, but there is just not enough room for the double row light bar. I had to ad the extensions that come with it and mount in front. It looks sweet, especially with the optional cover on, so I am certainly not disappointed.
Question though, why are you only going 42" ?
Here is the direct link to the light bar in Aus if it helpsI get automatically rerouted to stediusa web site, where it doesn't list the 52". Seeing your Gren I think I do want 52"!
Stedi auto-routes me to a 404 error on the stediusa.com web site. I cannot load their .au web pages anymore???Here is the direct link to the light bar in Aus if it helps
52 inch ST4K 100 LED Double Row Light Bar
Our all-new ST4K™ 52 Inch LED Light Bar is integrated with 100 of OSRAM’s® finest OSLON® LEDs, for a combination of 16 Flood + 58 Spot + 16 Flood reflector distribution forms. Expect a remarkable beam that pushes the wide beam out at 50° and spot beam at 5.8° all the way to staggering 1 lux @...www.stedi.com.au
Sorry, I've got nothing for US supply