I had a chat with one of my local garages - a small but very able and trusted outfit - about whether they could take on my Grenadier. They said it would depend on availability of parts and said they would make enquiries. Knowing how difficult it has been for my existing service centre to speak to INEOS HQ - and they are a registered centre - I'm not holding my breath.
But it would be great if small service centres could repair our cars. I used to own a Porsche and was always happy for my local garage to service it as long as they used genuine parts which protected the warranty. Obviously I'd want the same arrangement with the Grenadier. Not sure whether there'd be a prohibitive outlay of diagnostic software, or not.
Given the original philosophy behind the Grenadier = a strong, go-anywhere, utilitarian, easy-to-work-on workhorse, wouldn't making parts and servicing-back up more widely available fit with the original "built on purpose" ethos?
Personally I hate dealership servicing. Porsche had squeaky clean service areas with glam dolly birds serving you cake and coffee and I was always thinking: "How much is this customer-pampering costing?" Soon swapped to dad-and-son in mucky-overalls garage where the curtesy car was a crappy old VW Polo (but it worked and got me home and back). INEOS agency service guy is a nice bloke but even he balks at the cost of the annual service - close on £800. I'd rather be held up by Dick Turpin, thank you!
"I had a chat with one of my local garages - a small but very able and trusted outfit - about whether they could take on my Grenadier. They said it would depend on availability of parts and said they would make enquiries. Knowing how difficult it has been for my existing service centre to speak to INEOS HQ - and they are a registered centre - I'm not holding my breath."
The big hangup that I see is the computer hookup stuff. Parts and fluids can be acquired but the software becomes a two part issue IMO. 1-Will IA make the system available to private shops and 2 -will your local shop want to invest into getting that software. If it's a "rental" thing, maybe, but I can't see a mom and pop place shelling out thousands to service a handful of vehicles.
"Given the original philosophy behind the Grenadier = a strong, go-anywhere, utilitarian, easy-to-work-on workhorse, wouldn't making parts and servicing-back up more widely available fit with the original "built on purpose" ethos?"
At this point, it's sadly become apparent this didn't pan out as advertised. My guess is that on day 1, Jim et al wanted it that way - I truly believe that was the goal. But, I think it was naive on his part because the realities of 2023+ automotive legislation doesn't seem to allow for it. The issue is compounded because of the IP involved with the manufacturers of the trucks' many name-brand components (ie, what will BMW allow, what will ZF allow, etc.). You can argue that the LC 70 series is go-anywhere, easy-to-work on, etc. etc., but it is not a true global vehicle (read not a vehicle for the US market) and its future might be bleak if OZ is making ADAS crap part of the equation.
The impetus for Jim's quest was the demise of the proper Land Rover Defender which was, albeit far from perfect and having its own issues, a go-anywhere, etc. etc. vehicle. His original goal (pre Projekt Grenadier) was to just keep making the Defender but that did not pan out. Thereafter, if the day one mission was a "modern" Defender, I think they did ok within the parameters of 2024 automotive manufacturing and legislation. But... I would add IA's ego wrote some checks reality couldn't cash; the frustrating bit is they then made some really odd choices and added complexity that could have been avoided. You know, a weird TPMS system that prohibits rotating your own tires, an HVAC system that pales in comparison to those found on vehicles a quarter of its price, a WTF were they thinking service reset setup, bespoke headlamps, sketchy software, etc.
Just my two cents or pence or whatever