You keep harping on the point of "what promises?" but you are missing the point. If you were following the grenadier from the start from within the US, you'd see that product get rolled out internationally with price quotes, deposits, and guarantees that make the release in the US not only look like an afterthought, but at a potential price point that may make many of us say "screw it, that's too much much... I'm going to go ahead and commit to buying a different vehicle now."
Some kind of statement from ineos on expected US pricing (even if pegged to inflation rate) would be appreciated because it feels like we're being strung along. I suspect the kind of people interested in buying a grenadier are like me and keep their vehicles for 10+ years, hundreds of thousands of miles, and repair their vehicles themselves when humanly possibly. We're very loyal to brands and expect honesty and transparency.
I mean they kind of have made a statement though - “pricing for US customers will be announced later”.
They’ve got a lot of stuff to do before they’ll even know the final price. Their model was originally to do direct sales, but thanks to laws in the US written by dealership-paid lobbyists, they aren’t able to do that. So they have to find a dealer network and add their cut into the final price. They’ve got to sort out logistics. How much will it cost them to ship a boatload of cars to the USA? Depends on when they ship. A price quote from 3 months ago is no longer valid. And again - where are they shipping to? What dealers? Things have to happen in order.
That’s just two examples but the task list is long — they also have to get this thing tested by the NTSB to have a crash rating so insurance companies will back it. They have to figure out how their service and parts network will work, etc. It’s not unreasonable that they have yet to tell us a price, because they don’t know what it’ll be, because there’s stuff they need to figure out.
This has been their MO from the start though — they’ve been ridiculously transparent with this vehicle from day 1. Most manufacturers keep things quiet till they are ready to put the cars in the hands of customers — camouflage the design for testing, don’t even announce they are planning a new model till it’s in production, etc. Ineos has pulled back the curtain basically since that day in the Pub — including the contentious stuff where they’ve had to pivot, like abandoning the idea of building in Wales (which cost them a few customers who are nostalgic for the days of the sun never setting on their empire!). But they were up front about it, and that’s a very unusual approach for a car company to take.
The Grenadier is the graphene of the auto world — as soon as it was discovered, it lit up the media with promise of how it will do anything from enhance batteries to microchips. About the only thing it can’t do is leave the lab!
The difference between graphene and the Grenadier is what you’ve stated Mgo - there’s no one waiting to decide between graphene and copper, or whatever, to meet their needs. There are a lot of people who are wanting to decide between a Grenadier and the Jeep or 4Runner or f-150. I would suggest that those folks have to make a decision: wait and see, and accept the promises of what these rigs will be, and decide if it’s worth the money when we know, or just go buy something else. The Grenadier is not appropriate really for someone who needs a car now. It’s for people who want a car that is promised to do certain things, but can afford to wait and see. In 5 years, we’ll be in a different space because it’ll be available but right now it’s very experimental and in the “early adopter” stage.
There is no “something else” for me - the Gren does certain things no other new car available to me will do. For me it’s Graphene. There’s no viable alternative. So I will wait for it to “leave the lab”.