Do I? Really? And It's probably more like 45k at these prices. And I reckon even if I got my new Grenadier I'd still end up sinking more into it on top of standard.
I guess it depends what you want. The main thing that I can think of that I'd need to add to the Toyota that the grenadier has would be a dual battery system and a roo bar. Plus the optional factory diff locks. I'd also need a cargo barrier, and UHF. I would think I'd get change out of 10k.
I mean if you really wanted to lay into the after market stuff you probably could get a 70 wagon close to a grenadier. Coil conversion etc.. But I mean
frankly the Grenadier needs a GVM increase too. It just hasn't been developed yet. I guess it depends what you class "need" and "want".
I think there is no point comparing different vehicles like this against each other, only against a list of individuals needs and wants.
I could not see myself driving a 70 series daily, because it is just too unrefined for me, but then again i couldn't see myself driving a Range Rover daily as it is too refined for me.
But that is me. Not everyone.
I love driving manuals, but wouldn't buy one now, because I want the convenience of automatic and also as I get older who knows what health issues might arise.
I was in a 10 year old Pajero yesterday that has had a long life of towing vans around Australia. It rattled, squeaked, groaned and kept on going, but I couldn't drive it every day.
I drove a mates 70 series dual cab, with GVM upgrade, lifted, canopy etc and I needed a step to get up to the fitted side steps.
It was horrible to drive and steered like a ship in cross winds. 327,000 kms on the clock didn't help.
Not to mention the stupid sound of a wastegate blow-off wanker valve.
as we have discovered on here however so many of us have different use cases, needs and wants that it is leading to some fantastic/questionable/dubious/amusing modifications.