Isn't that the opposite of how they designed the system?
As far as I understand it, the idea is that the aux battery should support the main battery when the charge is low and therefore no consumers should be connected to the aux battery.
If that is the case, then it is possible to suck both batteries empty, as at one point the aux battery can't support the main battery anymore but power consumption will continue. It is nearly the same as simply connecting two batteries in parallel. That gives you more overall power you can consume and increases the use time, but if it is really the case that the power consumers are always use the starter battery....ui. How should the loader protect the starter battery from being discharged? That would only be possible by measuring the available power of the aux battery and how long it can still support the starter battery. If it gets too low the loader must cut of power consumers. Is that the case? If not, you can only protect your starter battery from being discharged by using smart devices which cut off themselves when they sense a certain volt level....
However, from the purchase and mounting point of view it is clever, as you can use the same cabling for cars with or without aux battery.
I would always recommend a system where you may suck the aux battery empty, but never the starter battery....especially after my visit in Lappland a few weeks ago where we stood for the night at less than -30°C...I don't want to imagine standing there in the middle of nowhere and my engine doesn't crank in the morning because I had to use the aux heater during the night....
AWo
Last edited: