There are many threads about wiring up the WolfBox G900. This isn't one of them. This thread is for discussion about image quality and software between the G900 and G900 Pro.
I have a G900 that works great but I was thinking about pulling it out to install in a Polaris Ranger and putting the G900 Pro in my IG. However, there is a video on YouTube comparing the G900 to the G900 Pro (
View: https://youtu.be/J6-xgi_xx9s?si=A2iSaYwDs4Ui17NF
) but at times the rear image at night of the Pro, while sharper, does not appear as bright as the original G900 but the tradeoff is the G900 image appears to be over saturated and grainy. No way to know if the guy set the mirror up properly to get an apples to apples comparison.
So, I want to know.. from those that swapped out to the Pro, how is the image, especially the rear at night? How is the software? I know @AngusMacG seems to be having issues.
Thanks in advance for your comments.
I have a G900 that works great but I was thinking about pulling it out to install in a Polaris Ranger and putting the G900 Pro in my IG. However, there is a video on YouTube comparing the G900 to the G900 Pro (
) but at times the rear image at night of the Pro, while sharper, does not appear as bright as the original G900 but the tradeoff is the G900 image appears to be over saturated and grainy. No way to know if the guy set the mirror up properly to get an apples to apples comparison.
So, I want to know.. from those that swapped out to the Pro, how is the image, especially the rear at night? How is the software? I know @AngusMacG seems to be having issues.
Thanks in advance for your comments.