No problem, you can always disagree with me. I do not take that personel,
@Jean Mercier, I highly respect and appreciate your posts.
However, you won't find any employee who will bypass the official organization. You can blame Ineos for their official support, but that is how it works. You have to live with that as an owner.
For me personal there is no value in warm words like "we know and investgate"...it is simply not helpful, a plaster at max, not more. Maybe it is even a lie to calm the waves and buy time.
Common sense and experience tells me they know about almost all, maybe all, problems. There are enough feedback channels open.
However, some will be investigated and there must be a solution because otherwise there will be trouble. Some will be solved, because it's easy and/or cheap. Others won't be solved quickly to various reasons like cost, time, importance and if there is a way to solve it silently. And some problems can't be solved soon, like design flaws. If there is for example a fold which is too weak or mishaped, solving that would mean a huge impact like new tools etc. You may get a workaround, not more.
I mentioned it already somewhere else, the car was released too soon. I could imagine, that the support organization was not prepared for this. And as Ineos is actually going through tough cost cuttings, it is questionablw if it will get better soon.
In addition I see strategic mistakes like offering things like the winch, dual-battery system, etc. on their own. It increases complexity for the support and dealers, it increases costs for storage, spare parts, building, manuals, education of personnel, homologation. And if it fails or is done in a bad way, the negative credits go to Ineos. You can find enough examples here. Bringing a car to the market, especially for the very first time, in times which require to follow so unbelivable many rules and laws etc is a very, very complex and difficult thing. One of the most difficult things I can think of. Why make it even more difficult? If you can't live without doing that, leave it for the second generation, when you have tamed your car and your organization is ready.
I would have left that completely to the aftermarket. There are experts and the aftermarket has more freedom than the manufacturer. Ineos would have been at least out of the line of fire for bad solutions and could focus on their product. The customer would benefit from a broad range of different offers at different prices. Ok, at least that will the case, as the aftermarket will offer their solutions anyway.
How they did it means, they had to develop this stuff, buy it (logistic costs), test it, homologate it, and now they have to take care about all that on their own and the costs are shared among all customers, if you buy a winch or not.
1
They even could have taken the role of a supervisor, like Land Rover did in the past, to approve solutions but let the aftermarket do it, support it and also get the good and bad credits.
AWo