The Grenadier Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to contribute to the community by adding your own topics, posts, and connect with other members through your own private inbox! INEOS Agents, Dealers or Commercial vendors please contact admin@theineosforum.com for a commercial account.

Long term parking and battery discharge

parb

Grenadier Owner
Lifetime Supporter
Local time
3:20 PM
Joined
Sep 10, 2023
Messages
1,438
Location
Silicon Valley, CA, USA
There has been lots of talk about the battery losing charge quickly when parked long term.

I've had my car parked, locked and with the alarm on for 3 weeks and 2 days. I was overseas for work.
Just connected to my victron battery monitor with a shunt, it shows 97% battery after 3 weeks.
I don't have my fridge in the car but otherwise it's been just turned off and parked after I came home from work the day before I left for my trip.

I'm very happy with that.

Just sharing since there has been some concern about it on the forum.
1000000629.png
 
Mine will drop 9% overnight and it wont charge over the mid 70's anymore. Nothing plugged in but wolfbox that auto offs. it'll be at 73%, charge at 2a and 14.2v. The system sucks. If I could rip out the alt for an old school GM 1 wire I would.
 
When people report these anecdotes, you need to indicate your build month/year.
Mine was built December 2023. I took delivery in april 2024.
I have a wolfbox with the power controller setup to auto-off at the middle level (I think that is 11.6v? The screen auto offs 30 Seconds after the ignition is off.
 
There has been lots of talk about the battery losing charge quickly when parked long term.

I've had my car parked, locked and with the alarm on for 3 weeks and 2 days. I was overseas for work.
Just connected to my victron battery monitor with a shunt, it shows 97% battery after 3 weeks.
I don't have my fridge in the car but otherwise it's been just turned off and parked after I came home from work the day before I left for my trip.

I'm very happy with that.

Just sharing since there has been some concern about it on the forum.View attachment 7894473

How does the 97% on your battery monitor compare to the battery % reading on the vehicle’s infotainment screen?
 
I'll update it in the morning. Been busy today with an unexpected emergency (water leak in the house), sorted it out now but I'm tired from working on it for most of the day.
 
There has been lots of talk about the battery losing charge quickly when parked long term.

I've had my car parked, locked and with the alarm on for 3 weeks and 2 days. I was overseas for work.
Just connected to my victron battery monitor with a shunt, it shows 97% battery after 3 weeks.
I don't have my fridge in the car but otherwise it's been just turned off and parked after I came home from work the day before I left for my trip.

I'm very happy with that.

Just sharing since there has been some concern about it on the forum.View attachment 7894473

The Smart shunt reading seems way optimistic...
Sundry other SOC vs Voltage charts for lead acid batteries estimate a voltage of 12 4-12.5v to represent a SOC at 75%, which after 3 weeks is still rather good considering parasitic drag e.g. from the alarm/securitysystem.....
Perhaps the Smart Shunt requires re-calibrating?
See also the discussion regarding the "true" function of the secondary battery/Ctek 120S device in https://www.theineosforum.com/threa...tures-and-install-information.12412843/unread
a video by Robert Pepper where he interviews Ctek engineers (video posting courtesy of @TheDocAUS)
 
Last edited:
The Smart shunt reading seems way optimistic...
Sundry other SOC vs Voltage charts for lead acid batteries estimate a voltage of 12 4-12.5v to represent a SOC at 75%, which after 3 weeks is still rather good considering parasitic drag e.g. from the alarm/securitysystem.....
Perhaps the Smart Shunt requires re-calibrating?
See also the discussion regarding the "true" function of the secondary battery/Ctek 120S device in https://www.theineosforum.com/threa...tures-and-install-information.12412843/unread
a video by Robert Pepper where he interviews Ctek engineers (video posting courtesy of @TheDocAUS)
I do not have much experience with smart shunts, but what I do have suggests these shunts do not accurately monitor small power drains over longer periods. However, they are pretty good for bigger draws from fridges to induction cooktops.
 
From Paul Oddy on Robert Pepper's video above:
"Your alternator will never fully charge your battery "
 
Last edited:
Mine will drop 9% overnight and it wont charge over the mid 70's anymore. Nothing plugged in but wolfbox that auto offs. it'll be at 73%, charge at 2a and 14.2v. The system sucks. If I could rip out the alt for an old school GM 1 wire I would.
The recharge is horrible. I have never seen more than 2a displayed.

I’m coming up on 3+ weeks parked. I’ll post the indicated battery level. In the past mine had dropped to low-/mid-80%.

Tangent: I want to put solar on the roof to offset my fridge but I’m afraid any further research and I’ll pull the whole factory dual battery system out.
 
The recharge is horrible. I have never seen more than 2a displayed.

I’m coming up on 3+ weeks parked. I’ll post the indicated battery level. In the past mine had dropped to low-/mid-80%.

Tangent: I want to put solar on the roof to offset my fridge but I’m afraid any further research and I’ll pull the whole factory dual battery system out.
Upon a start-up, I've seen the charge current go up to 27A (after running a fridge overnight). That is probably much lower than initial surge - between the time the engine starts and I go through the "pilot's checklist," probably a minute passes.
 
Mine will drop 9% overnight and it wont charge over the mid 70's anymore. Nothing plugged in but wolfbox that auto offs. it'll be at 73%, charge at 2a and 14.2v. The system sucks. If I could rip out the alt for an old school GM 1 wire I would.
Zimm, you have to love your truck and bitch less about it - 'cause that's all you've been doing lately :)
Generally, I don't trust anything about listing the SOC of a lead-acid battery. The only thing matters is the battery voltage in the morning - if it's over 12.5V, there isn't anything to worry about.
Charge at 2A @ 14.2V only means that the battery is either charged to capacity, or its internal resistance is so high that it simply cannot take a larger current than 2A at 14.2V.
It is easy to design the system that detects the second condition (momentarily run 1-5A discharge current and measure the voltage drop), but I'd be amazed if that's how it is done in a Grenadier.
Ripping out the alternator for an old school 1-wire accomplishes nothing. Zero.
 
Two more pictures.
The ineos builtin bms thinks the battery is at 67% discharge after 3 weeks and 3 days being parked on my driveway. I do not think this is a real number. I did the math and with my fully charged battery it would suggest that my vehicle consumed 1.5A continuously since I parked. I don't believe that for a second, it's way too much of an low power draw in an parked car with no active accessories. Perhaps the ineos is calibrated with a wrong a peukert coefficient?

My victron on the other hand believes my car consumed 145mA continuously since I parked it. That I believe totally. Sounds about right for low power mode of an alarm and no other active vehicle electronics. Maybe a touch optimistic since I think my Wolfbox parking monitor pulls about 100mA when parked but I don't think it's far off.

Shunts are generally really good at measuring low power, I got to imagine they have really good op-amps to measure the power loss across the shunt at very low currents. I have an EE degree and while it's been a while since I designed these types of circuits, they are really trivial to do. And low power digital circuits are easy these days.


Pics
1000021852.png



1000021853.jpg
 
Wir hatten einmal eine (fast) leere Batterie, obwohl die Anzeige nicht ausging. Der Motor sprang trotzdem an und die Batterie wurde über 30 Minuten mit über 100A geladen.
127A.jpg
 
Hi Parb, Can you show the Trends tab and show the graph for the starting voltage and the discharge over the 3 weeks ( you can zoom out to see this)? It maybe possible to show the cumulated power consumption.

Regards,
Carpetman
 
Two more pictures.
The ineos builtin bms thinks the battery is at 67% discharge after 3 weeks and 3 days being parked on my driveway. I do not think this is a real number. I did the math and with my fully charged battery it would suggest that my vehicle consumed 1.5A continuously since I parked. I don't believe that for a second, it's way too much of an low power draw in an parked car with no active accessories. Perhaps the ineos is calibrated with a wrong a peukert coefficient?

My victron on the other hand believes my car consumed 145mA continuously since I parked it. That I believe totally. Sounds about right for low power mode of an alarm and no other active vehicle electronics. Maybe a touch optimistic since I think my Wolfbox parking monitor pulls about 100mA when parked but I don't think it's far off.

Shunts are generally really good at measuring low power, I got to imagine they have really good op-amps to measure the power loss across the shunt at very low currents. I have an EE degree and while it's been a while since I designed these types of circuits, they are really trivial to do. And low power digital circuits are easy these days.


Pics
View attachment 7894553


View attachment 7894554
Hi Parb,

Can you check you calculations as I don't think it is correct.

You were gone for 576hrs (3weeks and 3 days). Therefore if I assume your battery was as 100% state of charge at the start and 67% at the end you would have consume 34.65Ah. If you divide that by the time you were gone that would be 34.65/576=0.06A (60mA) static current.
If the battery was only 90% charged at the start of your trip that would be 0.042A static current.


I also have a smartshunt on my starter battery, I installed it before I went of vacation for 2 weeks. It was at 12.74V when I left, and gradually discharged to 12.49V. The SOC from the car was at 65% when I got back. I don't have the starting number but I think it was about 80%.

The smartshunt did not show a significant reduction in the SoC, but from the manual, if the current is below 0.1A it will record as zero.

Regards,
Carpetman
 
Wir hatten einmal eine (fast) leere Batterie, obwohl die Anzeige nicht ausging. Der Motor sprang trotzdem an und die Batterie wurde über 30 Minuten mit über 100A geladen.
View attachment 7894557
Damn, I never got that high, but after a couple days working on the truck using Android Auto and the audio system the recharge was pretty steady at around 60A once the battery warmed up for the 30 mins I drove it.
 
Zimm, you have to love your truck and bitch less about it - 'cause that's all you've been doing lately :)
Generally, I don't trust anything about listing the SOC of a lead-acid battery. The only thing matters is the battery voltage in the morning - if it's over 12.5V, there isn't anything to worry about.
Charge at 2A @ 14.2V only means that the battery is either charged to capacity, or its internal resistance is so high that it simply cannot take a larger current than 2A at 14.2V.
It is easy to design the system that detects the second condition (momentarily run 1-5A discharge current and measure the voltage drop), but I'd be amazed if that's how it is done in a Grenadier.
Ripping out the alternator for an old school 1-wire accomplishes nothing. Zero.
I've pulled both of the batteries and put them on a charger/conditioner. The same unit that keeps my now 8yo cheapy interstate G27's in my fj60 and boat in top shape. The main battery is acting like its sulfating already. It cant reach 100% and goes into condition mode. The secondary battery was at 50%. The only time I've dealt with that is when they are 1) end of life cycle, 2) I neglected them by letting them sit to low too long. Never on a new battery. With a gm 1 wire I really don't need to worry about a using a dcdc. Ive set up trucks like Ineos has it, where the second battery is purely redundant using a automatic isolator with a manual override and it works great. Car manufacturers wants to save mechanical load on an engine for emissions, such as what they are doing here, but however they have it set, it leaves me with an undercharged battery that has a shorter life. I can watch the supplied voltage drop on cruise and acceleration, and pick up under braking, so I know what they are doing and why.
 
I've pulled both of the batteries and put them on a charger/conditioner. The same unit that keeps my now 8yo cheapy interstate G27's in my fj60 and boat in top shape. The main battery is acting like its sulfating already. It cant reach 100% and goes into condition mode. The secondary battery was at 50%. The only time I've dealt with that is when they are 1) end of life cycle, 2) I neglected them by letting them sit to low too long. Never on a new battery. With a gm 1 wire I really don't need to worry about a using a dcdc. Ive set up trucks like Ineos has it, where the second battery is purely redundant using a automatic isolator with a manual override and it works great. Car manufacturers wants to save mechanical load on an engine for emissions, such as what they are doing here, but however they have it set, it leaves me with an undercharged battery that has a shorter life. I can watch the supplied voltage drop on cruise and acceleration, and pick up under braking, so I know what they are doing and why.
I can't possibly justify using the second battery the way Ineos chose to do. It is super simple to have dual batteries - but it would be super simpler just to leave room for a larger AGM single unit. I don't know if the dual-battery set up is at fault - I'd rip that crap out if it behaved like that.

Speaking of age - batteries used to last for a decade. Now, three years is a decent clip. I had to decommission a beautiful Odissey after only 5 years - it will not charge beyond 12.2 V.
 
Back
Top Bottom