For those thinking the depreciation of Grenadiers means we got a bad deal, you can always comfort yourself with another twisted logic that is often used when talking about young car companies: According to this thread, so far Ineos has spent $3.4 Billion (I suspect this figure is low) and sold only 20K cars. That means each car cost $170K. I paid a lot less than that for my IG so I got a great deal.
Of course that's not a logical way to look at the investment. An analogy of why that is faulty logic would be a new pizza restaurant that cost $500k to build. After the first week of business they sold 1000 pizzas for $50 each. Therefore they lost $450 per pizza sold.
Why is that faulty logic? The fact that the investment in the pizza restaurant was not fully paid-off in the first week of sales, does not mean it is doomed to fail or that the owner lost $450 per pizza. It was a longer term investment that may never need to recover the initial investment, provided the operating income exceeds the operating costs and the cost of debt, then there is "profit" to be had.
The same is true for Ineos Automotive, provided the materials and labor that go into each unit, together with a proportional share of the cost of overhead and debt, are less than the price earned by Ineos when that unit is sold, then that unit is part of a profitable business model.
On the exceedingly rare occasion when I think about the depreciation that my IG has undoubtedly suffered since I bought it new; I comfort myself with the fact that I have no plans to sell it, and that the fun and memories it has given me over the past year plus and 15,000 miles was worth every cent of imaginary depreciation.