The Grenadier Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to contribute to the community by adding your own topics, posts, and connect with other members through your own private inbox! INEOS Agents, Dealers or Commercial vendors please contact admin@theineosforum.com for a commercial account.

Failed Bolt - Suspension Arm

pete54

GG-2562
Grenadier Owner
Lifetime Supporter
Local time
5:25 PM
Joined
Apr 27, 2023
Messages
87
Location
Scotland
I noticed a nut sitting under my Grenadier this afternoon - closer inspection revealed it to be the nut and part of the bolt (sheared through) from the rear passenger side suspension arm bush. Luckily it dropped off at home rather than out on the road! Has anyone else had this happen? On a positive note, response from Ineos Recovery (AA) was very swift - didn’t have a bolt of the same size but had one big enough at least to get me to the dealership (luckily only a few miles away for me). Hopefully will be a very quick fix although a replacement may need to be flown in. Only done around 990 miles.
IMG_9867.jpeg
IMG_9868.jpeg
IMG_9866.jpeg
 
I noticed a nut sitting under my Grenadier this afternoon - closer inspection revealed it to be the nut and part of the bolt (sheared through) from the rear passenger side suspension arm bush. Luckily it dropped off at home rather than out on the road! Has anyone else had this happen? On a positive note, response from Ineos Recovery (AA) was very swift - didn’t have a bolt of the same size but had one big enough at least to get me to the dealership (luckily only a few miles away for me). Hopefully will be a very quick fix although a replacement may need to be flown in. Only done around 990 miles.View attachment 7840661View attachment 7840662View attachment 7840663
Wow, Perhaps someone at the factory over torqued it?
DaBull
 
Wow, Perhaps someone at the factory over torqued it?
DaBull
Or a bolt manufacturing defect. Can't see properly on my phone but there looks to be a slight sign of honeycombing in the bolt shank.
 
I noticed a nut sitting under my Grenadier this afternoon - closer inspection revealed it to be the nut and part of the bolt (sheared through) from the rear passenger side suspension arm bush. <snip>

Do you mean the radius arm ?
An (approx_ 1M long) arm from the underside of the rear axle going forward to the chassis.
 
Do you mean the radius arm ?
An (approx_ 1M long) arm from the underside of the rear axle going forward to the chassis.
Thanks - yes, that’s the one
 
Bolts are classified according to strength in stardard ISO 898/2. Marking is: A.B, where:
  • A = tensile strength of bolt in 100 N/mm2, used values typically 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
  • B = ratio yield strength/tensile strength x 10, typically 6. 8, or 9
Not all combinatons are available:
  • 4.6 is above mentioned crappy Chinese, used in non-critical locations, not usually available in Europe
  • 5.8 very rarely used
  • 8.8 most common grade, pretty standard in Europe
  • 10.9 high strength, most Allen head bolts, typically used in suspension components
  • 12.9 extreme strength
Marking can be found from bolt head. If a Chinese bolt is graded to 10.9 it needs to fulfil the standard. Overtorque will break any bolt. One must remember that increasing strength class makes material more brittle and fatigue strenght may not increase respectively.

sexkantsskruv1.png
 
I believe this was a known issue early-ish on in production; it has been updated since then. Your agent should be able to replace it with the new bolt quickly and get you back on the road.
 
It's interesting that it has an indent in the bolt and the offset washer with corresponging pin on the washer. I presume this is to stop it twisting/roating against the cleat, ie so that it stays solid whilst the bushing rotates around the bolt ?.
If that is the case then why is it 'dry' ?

There is some force against that bolt (shear) as it's there to stop the axle from moving out of alignment with the chassis (backwards or forwards).
The rotation (of the bolt in the bush or the bush around the bolt) will allow the axle to move vertically (all be it in a slight curve), which it needs to do as the springs compress and expand.
I would suggest there is a real issue there.
That nut twisted off.
As the rear axle tried to move, the cleat held the bolt head and nut still, and the bushing rotated the bolt until it sheared.
It's likely it's a 10.9 HT bolt and as the axle moved (up or down) it simply (and effectively) sheared/twisted the nut off.

If it's supposed to move inside the bushing, then surely it should be greased ?
After a while the plating will wear off and that part of the car will oxidise quite quickly allowing the bolt to sieze the inside of the bushing.
I don't fully understand why the bolt is captive (or perhaps I have missinterpreted the shape of the washers ?).
 
It's interesting that it has an indent in the bolt and the offset washer with corresponging pin on the washer. I presume this is to stop it twisting/roating against the cleat, ie so that it stays solid whilst the bushing rotates around the bolt ?.
If that is the case then why is it 'dry' ?

There is some force against that bolt (shear) as it's there to stop the axle from moving out of alignment with the chassis (backwards or forwards).
The rotation (of the bolt in the bush or the bush around the bolt) will allow the axle to move vertically (all be it in a slight curve), which it needs to do as the springs compress and expand.
I would suggest there is a real issue there.
That nut twisted off.
As the rear axle tried to move, the cleat held the bolt head and nut still, and the bushing rotated the bolt until it sheared.
It's likely it's a 10.9 HT bolt and as the axle moved (up or down) it simply (and effectively) sheared/twisted the nut off.

If it's supposed to move inside the bushing, then surely it should be greased ?
After a while the plating will wear off and that part of the car will oxidise quite quickly allowing the bolt to sieze the inside of the bushing.
I don't fully understand why the bolt is captive (or perhaps I have missinterpreted the shape of the washers ?).

It is quite likely that the problem is one of a flaw in the steel of the bolt, or an over-torqued bolt - as others have said.

@Miki - I'm not sure about this, but from what I recall - if the bushing is rubber, you install the bolts dry, but if the bushing is polyurethane, you install with grease. Someone correct this if it is not right. What material are the Grenadier bushings made from?

To the OP @pete54
(1) Are you running larger tires or stock size?
(2) Are you running a suspension lift, or stock height?
(3) Have you been cycling the suspension off-road?

If the answer to one or more of these questions is "yes" than I wonder if part of the problem is that the rear lower control arm is not adjustable. The stock bushings do not allow for much lateral articulation. If you are doing a lot of technical off-roading / rock crawling. you might want to replace those arms with aftermarket ones - should those become available. Aftermarket arms for this purpose should (1) be adjustable in length, (2) have joints that provide for lateral articulation as well as the standard vertical or up/down articulation. See for example, the adjustable control arms made by Metalcloak for the Jeep JK. The JK came with short control arms - like the Grenadier - and so Metalcloak (and other companies) developed adjustable control arms that could be lengthened to accommodate a lifted suspension and larger tires - which is why I asked about tire size, suspension height, and type of driving.


If the answer to all three questions (above) is "no", then it is most likely a defective bolt, or one that was over-torqued.

@anand - you mention that this was a "known issue" - was the bolt known to be from a batch of bolts that were bad, or just not spec'd to the appropriate strength?
 
It is quite likely that the problem is one of a flaw in the steel of the bolt, or an over-torqued bolt - as others have said.

@Miki - I'm not sure about this, but from what I recall - if the bushing is rubber, you install the bolts dry, but if the bushing is polyurethane, you install with grease. Someone correct this if it is not right. What material are the Grenadier bushings made from?

To the OP @pete54
(1) Are you running larger tires or stock size?
(2) Are you running a suspension lift, or stock height?
(3) Have you been cycling the suspension off-road?

If the answer to one or more of these questions is "yes" than I wonder if part of the problem is that the rear lower control arm is not adjustable. The stock bushings do not allow for much lateral articulation. If you are doing a lot of technical off-roading / rock crawling. you might want to replace those arms with aftermarket ones - should those become available. Aftermarket arms for this purpose should (1) be adjustable in length, (2) have joints that provide for lateral articulation as well as the standard vertical or up/down articulation. See for example, the adjustable control arms made by Metalcloak for the Jeep JK. The JK came with short control arms - like the Grenadier - and so Metalcloak (and other companies) developed adjustable control arms that could be lengthened to accommodate a lifted suspension and larger tires - which is why I asked about tire size, suspension height, and type of driving.


If the answer to all three questions (above) is "no", then it is most likely a defective bolt, or one that was over-torqued.

@anand - you mention that this was a "known issue" - was the bolt known to be from a batch of bolts that were bad, or just not spec'd to the appropriate strength?
Thanks - in answer to your questions:

1) Are you running larger tires or stock size?
Stock tires
(2) Are you running a suspension lift, or stock height?
No - stock height
(3) Have you been cycling the suspension off-road?
Nothing remotely extreme other than Edinburgh potholes yet

Took delivery early last month so it’s not one of the early production models. Been driving well within limits while running in so nothing out of the ordinary/expected done.

Hopefully it’s just a defective bolt rather than a wider problem.
 
@anand - you mention that this was a "known issue" - was the bolt known to be from a batch of bolts that were bad, or just not spec'd to the appropriate strength?
I'm not sure of the specifics honestly, but this is what was conveyed to me about it. The "fix" happened well before the switch to MY24 production
 
Bolts are classified according to strength in stardard ISO 898/2. Marking is: A.B, where:
  • A = tensile strength of bolt in 100 N/mm2, used values typically 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12
  • B = ratio yield strength/tensile strength x 10, typically 6. 8, or 9
Not all combinatons are available:
  • 4.6 is above mentioned crappy Chinese, used in non-critical locations, not usually available in Europe
  • 5.8 very rarely used
  • 8.8 most common grade, pretty standard in Europe
  • 10.9 high strength, most Allen head bolts, typically used in suspension components
  • 12.9 extreme strength
Marking can be found from bolt head. If a Chinese bolt is graded to 10.9 it needs to fulfil the standard. Overtorque will break any bolt. One must remember that increasing strength class makes material more brittle and fatigue strenght may not increase respectively.

sexkantsskruv1.png
Only one of these fasters is a bolt prize for who guesses which one.
 
Back
Top Bottom