An English man would say 'route' if we are being pedanticNeither do I go down that root.
Not "rowt" , all you silly infleunced Aussie youtubers![]()

Arh!! youtube, ruining the English language the world over

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to contribute to the community by adding your own topics, posts, and connect with other members through your own private inbox! INEOS Agents, Dealers or Commercial vendors please contact admin@theineosforum.com for a commercial account.
An English man would say 'route' if we are being pedanticNeither do I go down that root.
Not "rowt" , all you silly infleunced Aussie youtubers![]()
Yes , route - as in beetroot. Root vegetable. Rowt is for seppos who say rooster , not cockAn English man would say 'route' if we are being pedantic
Arh!! youtube, ruining the English language the world over![]()
Curmudgeon's are sane.I would never dream of taking that title from @Zimm
The issue I think, is this may be the least aerodynamic car I've driven, and I've owned every brick there is. Sure its square, but it does look like they chamfered all the sharp edges, which, is apparently misleading. I drove off without wiping the snow, and not only is there a vortex in front the windshield, but it works so well with the airflow over the front end, it was DEPOSITING snow on the very leading edge of the front hood at 75mph. It wasn't just a low pressure zone or turbulent right above the middle of the hood, but air over the surface of the hood is moving 10mph faster than the hood itself. It's like a pickup bed, but in front. ... That alone may be the cause of the slight highway wandering. It's looking to swap ends like shooting an arrow backward's, or letting off the gas coming out of a turn in a 1980 911 turbo. The only thing keeping us straight at all, may be the polar vortex created by the slab cut rear end. This truck creates drag by mere human observation. It's quantum. No wonder I'm getting 14mpg.Dammit why doesn’t the aftermarket do something useful and come up with something for this? Probably my biggest irritant on the Grenadier, living up here on the North Pole.
930 3.0 turbos.... by the time the turbo spools and you get the power you want, you're mid corner but if you lift it'll definitely try to kill youIt's looking to swap ends like letting off the gas coming out of a turn in a 1980 911 turbo.
I was creating a nice snowball on the bonnet of of mine the other week. I think I was maintaining a speed between 20-40mph.The issue I think, is this may be the least aerodynamic car I've driven, and I've owned every brick there is. Sure its square, but it does look like they chamfered all the sharp edges, which, is apparently misleading. I drove off without wiping the snow, and not only is there a vortex in front the windshield, but it works so well with the airflow over the front end, it was DEPOSITING snow on the very leading edge of the front hood at 75mph. It wasn't just a low pressure zone or turbulent right above the middle of the hood, but air over the surface of the hood is moving 10mph faster than the hood itself. It's like a pickup bed, but in front. ... That alone may be the cause of the slight highway wandering. It's looking to swap ends like shooting an arrow backward's, or letting off the gas coming out of a turn in a 1980 911 turbo. The only thing keeping us straight at all, may be the polar vortex created by the slab cut rear end. This truck creates drag by mere human observation. It's quantum. No wonder I'm getting 14mpg.
Wasn't that part of the fun930 3.0 turbos.... by the time the turbo spools and you get the power you want, you're mid corner but if you lift it'll definitely try to kill you
I had an acquaintance 30 years ago that ran a 944, and decided to race his dads 911. Totaled it. Well, more like I knew him well. I didn’t like him.930 3.0 turbos.... by the time the turbo spools and you get the power you want, you're mid corner but if you lift it'll definitely try to kill you
Yeah I get it - there will be snow buildup with the vertical face - but what about some sort circular heating element around the lens that would at least help melt it off? Don’t know if that’s a good idea or not - but I hate having to get out and wipe off the lights when the snow is sticky.The issue I think, is this may be the least aerodynamic car I've driven, and I've owned every brick there is. Sure its square, but it does look like they chamfered all the sharp edges, which, is apparently misleading. I drove off without wiping the snow, and not only is there a vortex in front the windshield, but it works so well with the airflow over the front end, it was DEPOSITING snow on the very leading edge of the front hood at 75mph. It wasn't just a low pressure zone or turbulent right above the middle of the hood, but air over the surface of the hood is moving 10mph faster than the hood itself. It's like a pickup bed, but in front. ... That alone may be the cause of the slight highway wandering. It's looking to swap ends like shooting an arrow backward's, or letting off the gas coming out of a turn in a 1980 911 turbo. The only thing keeping us straight at all, may be the polar vortex created by the slab cut rear end. This truck creates drag by mere human observation. It's quantum. No wonder I'm getting 14mpg.
It has to work at least as well in snow, if not better, as a couple of Baja’s sticking out on the grill - and no, not legal on road. Since there’s not a heated headlamp wash (nor would I really want that - not on the Grenadier), what I was wondering about was some sort of heating elements over/around the headlamps that could be wired into the aux switch under the hood. I’ve never seen anything like that - just wondering. And I really like that hidden light bar, regardless - looks great and covers different spectrum needs/use-cases.Just wondering, do you think a light bar behind the grille (like Owl‘s hidden lightbar) would be a feasible solution? Snow-wise it would appear so at least from the picture, however, it won‘t be feasible to drive in traffic with additional 21k lumen.
some sprayers like my fj60 would have worked nice. I swapped those to JWSpeakers when they first came out, and I use the fluid enough I never noticed this, and that front end is quite the brick. Its an LED thing. Are any car companies heating the leds?Yeah I get it - there will be snow buildup with the vertical face - but what about some sort circular heating element around the lens that would at least help melt it off? Don’t know if that’s a good idea or not - but I hate having to get out and wipe off the lights when the snow is sticky.
What do you think about this? Haven’t heard anything about themsome sprayers like my fj60 would have worked nice. I swapped those to JWSpeakers when they first came out, and I use the fluid enough I never noticed this, and that front end is quite the brick. Its an LED thing. Are any car companies heating the leds?
Yea, honestly, I've never much had a use for 14 million lumens cranking from every angle. A set of reproduction 1950's driving lamps using a hella halogen like you'd you'd toss on an MG, is all I think I'm going to set up for the front end specifically for winter driving.Just wondering, do you think a light bar behind the grille (like Owl‘s hidden lightbar) would be a feasible solution? Snow-wise it would appear so at least from the picture, however, it won‘t be feasible to drive in traffic with additional 21k lumen.
Neat. But, are not the Gren headlights 8" and Jeeps 7"?What do you think about this? Haven’t heard anything about them
I was just looking for that - you read my mind. Are they 8”? I was also looking at heated options at JW Speaker - also 7”.Neat. But, are not the Gren headlights 8" and Jeeps 7"?