I ordered mine unseen and after the drive yesterday have no doubts.
Hadn't seen that before. Nice as well!See my post first drive in UK today
I researched for months for my next vehicle like many people do. Look at facts and figures and take vehicles for test drives.
Most people buy a house after a 15 minute walk through, well here in Australia anyway.
I have ordered a Grenadier and have never seen one in person.
Then again a few months ago I purchased a house i had never seen either.
It is a 20 metre wide x 60 metre deep flat block of land 50 metres from the water that happens to have an old 3 bed Queenslander on it.Glad to hear Im not the only one doing that Dave. Have done it twice in the past 12 months once in Toowoomba and the second time up in Townsville.
AreAll in all, time well spent. The only thing I'm not crazy about is the need for a code reader/writer for the full maintenance experience; modern emission requirements make logging changes and replacements with the system compulsory. Lee, the Service/Warranty Manager for the UK, Europe and the Middle East expected a suitable system to be £600ish plus software, so not trivial but not impossible either.
Back in the early days of the project, Ineos indicated that they would like to make the vehicle self contained, so users would not need readers/test books for maintenance. Now, as an (ex) owner of a 200Tdi engined 110, just spanners for routine work suited me fine, but it appears that emissions regulations make it impossible to avoid some sort of external monitoring of maintenance procedures. As I stated above, the costs of the equipment will not be prohibitive, but the need to rent software irks me.@ Jeremy996 - Are you able to expand a little bit more on your reservation, please?
True, but it was implied that this vehicle will be different. If the diagnostic/programming gear was built into the vehicle, one of the usual whinges about vehicle electronics could be nipped in the bud. Certainly, for independent travel, not needing a HawkEye or test book would be quite handy.I think it's been like that for a good while? Injectors need to be programmed, VCVs need pump learning procedure and pilot correction procedure ~ all need some form of diagnostic tool.
That certainly would be a bonus, although I'm not sure whether the associated cost, assuming it was passed on to the owner either as part of the core cost or an optional extra, would be better spent on a standalone generic unit that might be able to do multiple vehicles?True, but it was implied that this vehicle will be different. If the diagnostic/programming gear was built into the vehicle, one of the usual whinges about vehicle electronics could be nipped in the bud.
The problem is that different customers have different priorities and based on sales of other SUV's I am going to take a total guess and say that 94.863% of Ineos customers would have no use for it.That certainly would be a bonus, although I'm not sure whether the associated cost, assuming it was passed on to the owner either as part of the core cost or an optional extra, would be better spent on a standalone generic unit that might be able to do multiple vehicles?
I'd certainly prioritise it above, say, puddle lamps and ambient lighting, which in UK would give you a @ £350 budget & the Belstaff jackets a further @ £290.
No ECrider, I thought so as well but after recalculating I do come to exactly 94.863 % (well to be honest 94.86301)you rounded down again DaveB?
DaveB seems to me very reliable
Can’t be. The figures are obviously to accurate!I think he is just pulling figures out of his proverbial.