That's my point though, Ineos' software isn't really up to the same standard as any other manufacturer, and this is despite having the luxury of engineering their entire line from the ground up and a relatively limited feature set. And the luxury of the prior decade of automotive software invention. They didnt have to invent anything new. They didn't have to do what legacy manufacturers (who by the way, also aren't 'tech' companies) which is fold new tech into legacy existing systems, components, and operations with probably decades of prior design decisions behind them.
I get where you are coming from, and I think it's a very forgiving place. I'm not there, I think Ineos Auto was and is too well funded to have a low bar of expectations for them, and their actions (ie lack of action) in this space have further pushed me away from that forgiving place. I like the car, but it's software is a mess. It's a 'built for purpose' vehicle for which you can't even rotate the tires on and expect the tpms system to detect the tire location for example. This is a many-decade-old solved problem my guy, and it's by far not the only one that exists and is still unpatched.