I have to admit I was surprised by Harry's farm review, particularly the bit when he took it up the hill, that just didn't ring true. Yes, it's clear he really has a downer on the car and, while I agree with some of his points, I think that review taken as a whole was unduly harsh. I do get his underlying argument asking why anyone would build a car so basic when technologies and designs have moved on. I guess you could say the same of Morgan cars. The answer is that some people put a premium on utility, practicality, and traditional looks. If the Grenadier was a tank I'd liken it to the Russian T34, a reliable and unstoppable piece of kit. Why didn't Harry drive through mud and water? Wafting through all that long grass, it looked like a Cadbury's flake advert. I respect his views but, like most posters here, I'll make my own mind up thankyou.