You can read but not clear from my understanding. And this.The Autophix 9000 was highly recommended on the Australian websites. I couldn’t find the same in UK so ordered from Australia at £135.00 delivered. Just heard back from Autophix in China who tell me it is the same software as the UK suppled OM129 @ £79.00 on Amazon. Too late for me but a heads up for others.
email them quickly, they may be able to cancel it.Typical!! Just ordered the 9000 from Aus’ only a few hours ago.
Just done as you suggested. Thanks for suggesting. Might work.email them quickly, they may be able to cancel it.
Hi EricThe other alternative, if quick. How did you pay for it? If by BACS or a bank card it will need to go through currency transfer, your bank could stop it, BUT there may/will be a charge (usually £25) which may mean it is not worth doing and you have another OBD. Don't know anything about PayPal don't use it.
Those bloody Australians!Typical!! Just ordered the 9000 from Aus’ only a few hours ago.
Perhaps I'm not understanding what they are saying, but I've had no issues clearing codes.You can read but not clear from my understanding. And this.
View attachment 7849220
That's good to hear , but until at least a dozen people report success across several systems I'm keeping the credit card at home!Perhaps I'm not understanding what they are saying, but I've had no issues clearing codes.
It may clear generic codes but not Ineos specific drill down codesPerhaps I'm not understanding what they are saying, but I've had no issues clearing codes.
Sounds like a completely obvious solution to me.If INEOS has decided to "close" the ECU for external clearing attempts, they have very likely set a secret code/a password to do so if they want to do this themselves.
So it could eventually make sense to install a can-bus sniffer in the car to record the entire communication to find out how they do it. It should be something which does not hook in at the CAN protocol level but on a lower layer - which may sound easier than it actually is.
I'm on the caseSounds like a completely obvious solution to me.