I'll repeat what I said in my first post -
I think it was a great review, and I really enjoyed reading it. I'm excited about the Grenadier, and I think it looks like it is going to be a vehicle that - in terms of production quality and durability - will be vastly superior to the Wrangler. But when it comes to flex, the Wrangler is best in class. In the photos below, the Grenadier is lifting its front right tire - there is very little droop; look at the angle of the front axle. In the photo below that, the front right tire of the Wrangler is still touching the ground (which is what you want) despite the incredible angle of the front axle. Yes, the anti-sway bar is certainly disconnected on the Jeep, but the difference is enormous. Can't wait until we get some good objective test results like the
Ramp Travel Index (RTI).
NOTE: given that both vehicles run solid axles front and rear, and both run coil springs front and rear, it cannot be possible for one vehicle to have twice the payload of the other, and still flex the same. The engineers at Ineos chose to go for high payload (almost 2,000 pounds), and to do that they sacrificed some flex. The engineers at Jeep chose to go for massive flex, and to do that they sacrificed payload (about 875 pounds in the Rubicon). Neither choice is objectively good or bad. Buyers should purchase the vehicle that meets their needs.
View attachment 7799827
View attachment 7799828